Tongass Nat'l Forest
I hadn’t expected a book
by a local man about alleged mismanagement of a national forest to be other
than textbook dull.
I expected it to be full
of graphs and tables and leaden language.
Sometimes authors pay to
have books published because their work is poorly written and no publisher
will pay them for it, but not always.
Sometimes authors believe
so strongly in what they have to say that they lose patience with the slow
process of submission and rejection before a publisher takes on the book.
I half expected Bill Shoaf’s
book, The Taking of the Tongass: Alaska’s Rainforest, to be in the first
category. I did not expect it to be what it is—a well-written non-fiction
thriller with as much adventure, humor, suspense, and intrigue as a popular
novel.
The subject of how the U.S.
Forest Service manages and mismanages its domain interests me, and it would
be worth my time to read the book, even if it required a struggle through
a dull, poorly written treatise.
Bill Shoaf was a gung-ho
“timber beast,” a “green shorts” career USFS timber sale planner. His business
was cutting down trees. He was not a man you’d pick to become aligned with
individuals and groups to whom tree stumps are an abomination.
Shoaf’s career with the
Forest Service ended after he realized that his superiors in Alaska’s Tongass
National Forest were lying about how much timber was being cut and sold,
lying about how much could be cut while maintaining sustained yield, and
ignoring its own environmental guidelines.
When he’d exhausted in-house
avenues to correct mistakes and rectify wrongs, he had to chose between
his loyalty to his beloved Forest Service and his own strong sense of justice
and his personal integrity.
There is a myth that the
government protects whistleblowers from retribution. What the government
is more concerned with is protecting its own image, and departments within
government sometimes put protecting their own behinds and budgets ahead
of morality, legality, and national interest.
It’s not simply a battle
between good guys and bad guys. Shoaf writes of his disappointment when
even the environmental groups prove more interested in gaining protection
for their own “favorite places” and maintaining status as the biggest and
baddest environmentalists in their neck of the woods—and protecting their
ability to raise more money than the other groups, of course.
Shoaf isn’t a head-in-the-clouds
idealist. His idealism is practical and based on an immutable foundation:
honesty.
His business is, or was,
planning timber sales that are legal and that protect fish and birds and
the forest itself. What he can’t stand is lying, stealing, and cheating—lying
to the American people, stealing from our national forests, and cheating
in the way the Forest Service sometimes does its job.
What Bill Shoaf ran into
is old-growth bureaucracy.
When a government, or a
corporation, creates a department and gives it a job to do, that department
grows. At first it simply grows to better accomplish its mission, but it
eventually cross a line. Its primary purpose changes from doing a job to
sustaining its own existence and building itself into an empire.
Shoaf’s documented account
of Forest Service abuse of trust, dereliction of duty, and criminal activity
in one national forest is a prime example of bureaucratic evolution.
It is a book worth reading
by anyone who depends on forests for livelihood, for recreation, or for
spiritual sustenance. It is a book worth reading by any taxpayer who hates
seeing his money thrown away.
If you can’t find The Taking
of the Tongass in your local bookstore, write to
Back to main page
Back to archives
Next Article
|